Archive for June, 2009

The Science of Eating Disorders

 photo courtesy of http://www.makeuseof.com/

 For many years it has been observed that eating disorders (EDs) sometimes run in families, but it has not been known why. Do EDs develop because family members model disordered eating behaviors/attitudes that are emulated by those who observe them? On the other hand, is there a genetic cause that has nothing to do with modeled behavior? Or, is it a combination of both factors? These questions address the classic nature vs. nurture debate. Fortunately, as technology has become more sophisticated over the last 10 years, there has been much research into the role of genetics in EDs, and the results have already begun to help guide prevention and treatment efforts.

Family studies have produced the following conclusions:

  • If an individual’s mother or sister has had Anorexia Nervosa (AN), they are twelve times more likely than someone without a family history of AN to develop AN.
  • If an individual has a family member with Bulimia Nervosa (BN), they are four times more likely to develop BN than people without a family history of BN.
  • If an individual has a family member with Binge Eating Disorder (BED) they are two times more likely to develop BED than people without a family history of BED.

Twin studies that compare identical twins and fraternal twins have been helpful in detecting the genetic contribution to the development of EDs. This is because twins “share” the same family environment. However, while identical twins share 100% of their genes, fraternal twins only share 50% of their genes.

Twin studies have found that:

  • AN and BN are more likely to occur in both twins when they are identical (100% of the same genes) than in fraternal twins (50% of the same genes), suggesting that genetics play a very important role.

In genetic linkage studies, researchers collect genetic samples from multiple generations of family members in which at least two members have EDs. They look for common variations and “linkages” in the actual genes that may be passed from parent to child. Linkages are areas on a chromosome that contain several hundred genes. In genetic association studies, specific genes of interest are compared between people who do and do not have EDs.

Genetic studies have produced the following findings:

  • Significant linkages have been found on chromosome 10 for BN and chromosome 1 for AN. At this point it is unknown which genes in the identified linkages are involved in EDs and what these genes control.
  • Genes that control the neurotransmitter serotonin have received a lot of study and results suggest these genes may play an important role in EDs, particularly AN. Serotonin is involved in the regulation of appetite and eating behavior.
  • Certain personality traits common in people with EDs are also considered moderately heritable. Traits seen in childhood before people develop AN or BN include obsessionality and perfectionism. These traits are neither good nor bad; for instance, perfectionism that is directed towards achieving a “perfect body” might exacerbate an ED while perfectionism that is directed towards achieving “perfect grades” can make people successful in school.

What Are the Implications?

EDs are complex illnesses caused by multiple factors. While it appears that people may inherit a genetic vulnerability for EDs, this does not guarantee development of an ED. Rather, researchers think inherited genes may be “turned on” when an individual is exposed to particular environmental factors such as a culture that emphasizes thinness, dieting behavior, a traumatic event, participation in high-risk sports, or a combination of triggers. Ultimately, the hope is that a better understanding of the genetics of EDs will continue to inform prevention and treatment efforts and reduce stigma associated with the illness.

For more information, see http://www.anbn.org/.

Submitted by: Sarah Hubbard, PhD

Glamour Magazine’s 2009 Body-Image Survey: Insight with a Heavy Dose of Mixed Messages

Twenty-five years after their first body-image survey, Glamour Magazine revisited the task of polling 16,000 American women on how they feel about their bodies.  Interested readers could participate in the poll voluntarily by filling out a survey online so it doesn’t necessarily represent a random sample of women (particularly those who would choose NOT to answer questions about their body image).  While this wasn’t a scientific study , it does offer a rare glimpse at the collective state of female body image in our country and the results were recently discussed on NBC’s Today Show. 

Unfortunately, in order to read about the survey results online we are confronted with some of the reasons why our body image may suffer in the first place.  Be prepared.  Despite an opening line in the on-line article that reads, “We at Glamour think your body is fantastic”, you will simultaneously be bombarded by diet advertisements, offers to join weight loss and work out clubs, and countless airbrushed images of models whose bodies are not representative of 98% of us.  While reading, we are reminded to love our bodies as they are, yet targeted by countless internet ads and competing headlines convincing us of the best ways to change ourselves so we can look “better”.  While these mixed messages are certainly frustrating, this article is worth reading and is an opportunity to practice “critical viewing of the media” which involves a self-censoring of messages and images that are false, misleading or otherwise unhealthy for our self-esteem and body image.  Remember to focus on the article and the positive information it conveys such as suggestions from real women in the survey about ways to improve your body image, including:

  • Focus on professional achievements and look for validation in places other than in the mirror
  • Give compliments to other women often, and choose to believe and accept the compliments you receive from them! 
  • Ditch the dieting scene
  • Surround yourself with people who make you feel good about yourself

The poll also turned up several interesting statistics regarding body image including the fact that younger women (under 30) were 20% more likely to say they are happy with their bodies than older women.  Is this a result of a successful shift towards self-love for our younger generations?  Or, does this stem from increasing cultural and media pressures on women in their 40s, 50s and beyond to maintain an image that was previously only expected of teenagers and twenty-something’s?  What do you think?  We’ve started a thread on our discussion board, and we would love your feedback. Be sure to leave your comments after reading the full article, which you can find here: Glamour’s Body Image survey.